-By Frank Lovece
For movie details, please click here.
A thematically ambitious drama about television news and its
manipulation by corporate and political interests, and by the
ever-more-desperate race for ratings,
Rann ("Battle"), has
none of the Bollywood musical trappings that stateside audiences
have come to expect as the default. More in the tradition, if not
the execution, of Billy Wilder's
Ace in the Hole (1951), the
film waves an ominous flag indicating that whatever the deceptions,
outrages and compromises that afflict American news media, it's
that way that world over, including on the billion-plus
subcontinent.
Directed by the respected Ram Gopal Varma, whose 2005 hit
Sarkar was India's
The Godfather, and starring the
venerable Amitabh Bachchan,
Rann aims at a more discerning
crowd than do the wonderful romantic fluff that makes up the bulk
of Bollywood imports. It will likely do respectable business in the
ethnic/art-house circuit.
The issues are certainly trenchant to American moviegoers.
Bachchan's principled broadcaster, 24-hour news network founder
Vijay Harshwardhan Malik, is beset on all sides by pressures to
sensationalize his channel's content. His disgruntled son and heir
apparent, Jai (the single-name Sudeep), says it's not compromising
to make news delivery more "entertaining," and with advertisers
jumping ship to a flashy rival startup, Malik gives in.
Were this the first of many small compromises leading to a sea
change at his station, the film might have been better at examining
how standards get lowered in stages, almost imperceptibly. Instead,
Varma and screenwriter Rohit G. Banawlikar. on his first produced
film, cram in plots about a prime ministerial candidate (Paresh
Rawal) involved in both character assassination and real
assassination; Hindi prejudice against Muslims, in the form of
family pressure on Jai to drop his Muslim girlfriend (Neetu
Chandra); and corporate espionage, with Malik's CEO (Suchitra
Krishnamurthy), for reasons unexplained, betraying what is
essentially the Walter Cronkite of India. Tied into a couple of
these threads is an idealistic reporter (Ritesh Deshmukh) who, when
he ventures too close to uncovering the awful truth…pretty much
just does his job and files his story. Thrills and suspense are not
this movie's strong points.
But a sense of disappointment for the Fourth Estate is very much
so, and every crease in Bachchan's face conveys a longing for how
things should be, and a resigned acknowledgment of how things are.
Few actors could give his climactic, on-air speech without it
coming across as naïve or sanctimonious, but the ever-exceptional
Bachchan delivers it with a gravitas that makes you pay attention.
The score could have been a bit less melodramatic—it punctuates
emotional moments with clarion BA-BUMs that a soap opera would be
too embarrassed to use—but the fast-moving film carries a heartfelt
genuineness in its requiem for broadcast journalism. It may simply
be sloppy plotting that leaves some of its ideas dangling and
unresolved, but it could just as well be a recognition that
victories may be temporary, prejudices can go on indefinitely, and
in the big picture, we might simply just be getting the media we
deserve.
Film Review: Rann
Stylishly directed drama of a principled TV news network facing compromise and worse, as an election for prime minister turns deadly and entrenched interests manipulate both the media and the masses.
Feb 3, 2010
-By Frank Lovece
For movie details, please click here.
A thematically ambitious drama about television news and its manipulation by corporate and political interests, and by the ever-more-desperate race for ratings,
Rann ("Battle"), has none of the Bollywood musical trappings that stateside audiences have come to expect as the default. More in the tradition, if not the execution, of Billy Wilder's
Ace in the Hole (1951), the film waves an ominous flag indicating that whatever the deceptions, outrages and compromises that afflict American news media, it's that way that world over, including on the billion-plus subcontinent.
Directed by the respected Ram Gopal Varma, whose 2005 hit
Sarkar was India's
The Godfather, and starring the venerable Amitabh Bachchan,
Rann aims at a more discerning crowd than do the wonderful romantic fluff that makes up the bulk of Bollywood imports. It will likely do respectable business in the ethnic/art-house circuit.
The issues are certainly trenchant to American moviegoers. Bachchan's principled broadcaster, 24-hour news network founder Vijay Harshwardhan Malik, is beset on all sides by pressures to sensationalize his channel's content. His disgruntled son and heir apparent, Jai (the single-name Sudeep), says it's not compromising to make news delivery more "entertaining," and with advertisers jumping ship to a flashy rival startup, Malik gives in.
Were this the first of many small compromises leading to a sea change at his station, the film might have been better at examining how standards get lowered in stages, almost imperceptibly. Instead, Varma and screenwriter Rohit G. Banawlikar. on his first produced film, cram in plots about a prime ministerial candidate (Paresh Rawal) involved in both character assassination and real assassination; Hindi prejudice against Muslims, in the form of family pressure on Jai to drop his Muslim girlfriend (Neetu Chandra); and corporate espionage, with Malik's CEO (Suchitra Krishnamurthy), for reasons unexplained, betraying what is essentially the Walter Cronkite of India. Tied into a couple of these threads is an idealistic reporter (Ritesh Deshmukh) who, when he ventures too close to uncovering the awful truth…pretty much just does his job and files his story. Thrills and suspense are not this movie's strong points.
But a sense of disappointment for the Fourth Estate is very much so, and every crease in Bachchan's face conveys a longing for how things should be, and a resigned acknowledgment of how things are. Few actors could give his climactic, on-air speech without it coming across as naïve or sanctimonious, but the ever-exceptional Bachchan delivers it with a gravitas that makes you pay attention. The score could have been a bit less melodramatic—it punctuates emotional moments with clarion BA-BUMs that a soap opera would be too embarrassed to use—but the fast-moving film carries a heartfelt genuineness in its requiem for broadcast journalism. It may simply be sloppy plotting that leaves some of its ideas dangling and unresolved, but it could just as well be a recognition that victories may be temporary, prejudices can go on indefinitely, and in the big picture, we might simply just be getting the media we deserve.