Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: Objectified

Compilation of filmed interviews with industrial designers who talk about the philosophy of design, rather than the objects they designed.

May 5, 2009

-By Maria Garcia


filmjournal/photos/stylus/82422-Objectified_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

If you have ever wondered why Apple laptops have a “Delete” key that’s actually a “Backspace” key, or why kitchen equipment by Oxo has that testosterone, toolbox look, Objectified offers some answers, although not specific ones. Like Helvetica, Gary Hustwit’s first documentary, Objectified is mostly talking heads, in this case a dizzying number of industrial designers from around the world. The objects they design—which include chairs, toothbrushes, cars, cameras, coffee-makers and computers—are flashed on the screen in brief montages, but Hustwit rarely asks about a specific object. Nearly all the interviews are about the philosophy of design or the individual designer’s philosophy.

In some cases, Hustwit’s approach is enlightening, for instance when Karim Rashid (he designed the ubiquitous plastic bathroom pails with cut-out handles on each side) explains why the design of digital cameras should become more “self-contained and human.” There is no reason for a camera to be an inverted rectangle, he says—that shape came about because the camera had to accommodate roll film. In another instance, a Dutch designer, Hella Jongerius, talks about the Antipodean impulses inherent to industrial design which must be resolved in order to produce something people want to buy. All the objects are meant to be manufactured, she explains, yet designers and users want them to look handmade. She solves this dilemma by adding a pattern to the objects she crafts, one that trumpets their origin in human hands.

Mostly, Objectified is a lot of blather about architect Louis Sullivan’s “law,” which is that form follows function. The principle is easier to understand when it isn’t followed, and Apple provides a ready example: In Hustwit’s interview with the company’s designer, Jonathan Ive, their legendary indifference to users is explained—although not why MacBooks and iPhones lack a standard keyboard. In an interview with iconic German designer Dieter Rams, we learn that good design is “as little design as possible,” but not how he thinks the classic Braun products he crafted articulate that credo. Australian Marc Newson proclaims that “form begets form” and “design is the search for form,” but Hustwit never asks Newson how that philosophy is articulated in his “Embryo” chair, which looks like an amoeba with legs.

Objectified refuses to consider the objects, which is the real measure of each designer. Bill Moggridge is the one exception: During his interview, he punches keys on the first laptop, which he designed. He explains that initially, he did not realize the role software would play in the laptop’s operation, launching into the documentary’s best discussion of form and function. Hustwit reacts by editing the sequence to within an inch of its life because he doesn’t know what else to do. He’s not a filmmaker. He’s an interviewer, which gets to the larger issue of why Objectified’'s appeal is limited: There’s no aesthetic, no evident discriminating consciousness behind the documentary. Ironically, Hustwit’s objectivity, his inability or unwillingness to discuss the relative beauty and utility of these objects, makes us indifferent to them.


Film Review: Objectified

Compilation of filmed interviews with industrial designers who talk about the philosophy of design, rather than the objects they designed.

May 5, 2009

-By Maria Garcia


filmjournal/photos/stylus/82422-Objectified_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

If you have ever wondered why Apple laptops have a “Delete” key that’s actually a “Backspace” key, or why kitchen equipment by Oxo has that testosterone, toolbox look, Objectified offers some answers, although not specific ones. Like Helvetica, Gary Hustwit’s first documentary, Objectified is mostly talking heads, in this case a dizzying number of industrial designers from around the world. The objects they design—which include chairs, toothbrushes, cars, cameras, coffee-makers and computers—are flashed on the screen in brief montages, but Hustwit rarely asks about a specific object. Nearly all the interviews are about the philosophy of design or the individual designer’s philosophy.

In some cases, Hustwit’s approach is enlightening, for instance when Karim Rashid (he designed the ubiquitous plastic bathroom pails with cut-out handles on each side) explains why the design of digital cameras should become more “self-contained and human.” There is no reason for a camera to be an inverted rectangle, he says—that shape came about because the camera had to accommodate roll film. In another instance, a Dutch designer, Hella Jongerius, talks about the Antipodean impulses inherent to industrial design which must be resolved in order to produce something people want to buy. All the objects are meant to be manufactured, she explains, yet designers and users want them to look handmade. She solves this dilemma by adding a pattern to the objects she crafts, one that trumpets their origin in human hands.

Mostly, Objectified is a lot of blather about architect Louis Sullivan’s “law,” which is that form follows function. The principle is easier to understand when it isn’t followed, and Apple provides a ready example: In Hustwit’s interview with the company’s designer, Jonathan Ive, their legendary indifference to users is explained—although not why MacBooks and iPhones lack a standard keyboard. In an interview with iconic German designer Dieter Rams, we learn that good design is “as little design as possible,” but not how he thinks the classic Braun products he crafted articulate that credo. Australian Marc Newson proclaims that “form begets form” and “design is the search for form,” but Hustwit never asks Newson how that philosophy is articulated in his “Embryo” chair, which looks like an amoeba with legs.

Objectified refuses to consider the objects, which is the real measure of each designer. Bill Moggridge is the one exception: During his interview, he punches keys on the first laptop, which he designed. He explains that initially, he did not realize the role software would play in the laptop’s operation, launching into the documentary’s best discussion of form and function. Hustwit reacts by editing the sequence to within an inch of its life because he doesn’t know what else to do. He’s not a filmmaker. He’s an interviewer, which gets to the larger issue of why Objectified’'s appeal is limited: There’s no aesthetic, no evident discriminating consciousness behind the documentary. Ironically, Hustwit’s objectivity, his inability or unwillingness to discuss the relative beauty and utility of these objects, makes us indifferent to them.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

PK
Film Review: PK

An alien trying to return home tangles with religious authorities in a low-key Bollywood message drama. More »

A Small Section
Film Review: A Small Section of the World

Worthy but uninvolving documentary about the coffee-producing women of Costa Rica. More »

Sagrada
Film Review: Sagrada: The Mystery of Creation

The fabulous 130-year work-in-progress that is Barcelona's Sagrada Familia cathedral, as well as its crazy-brilliant originator, Antonio Gaudi, is the focus of this vividly informative documentary. More »

Inside the Mind of Leonardo
Film Review: Inside the Mind of Leonardo in 3D

Documentary-feature hybrid that offers unexpected insight into the world of Leonardo da Vinci, but nonetheless suffers from a heavy hand and pretentious sensibility. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

Into the Woods
Film Review: Into the Woods

Over-scaled, too dark and only intermittently charming Sondheim musical adaptation does a disservice to a great cast and is often so noisy you can't even appreciate the music. More »

The H obbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
Film Review: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

After rewriting the rules for modern fantasy cinema, for the better and worse, Peter Jackson’s six-film Tolkien saga slams, bangs and shudders to a long-overdue conclusion. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here