Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: The Armstrong Lie

Compelling portrait of an athlete undone by his own ambition.

Nov 7, 2013

-By Sarah Sluis


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1389018-Armstrong_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

What if the same trait that makes a man a success leads to his downfall? Lance Armstrong did not want to win. He wanted to dominate. The Armstrong Lie documents a man so driven to succeed that he doped and lied about it for years. Armstrong won the Tour de France seven times, beat cancer, and became a hero in a sport that needed a public face. He also hired one of the best doctors in the performance-enhancing business and sued anyone who dared to brand him as a doper. When everyone else got caught, he didn’t, because he was a cancer survivor, a champion and a celebrity. He was untouchable.

Director Alex Gibney composes his documentary using before-and-after interviews with Armstrong. He starts in 2008 when Armstrong looks the camera in the eye and tells everyone no, he has never doped. Then Gibney picks back up with Armstrong in 2013, shortly after he confessed to Oprah Winfrey on national television. Moving back and forth in time and drawing from interviews and archival footage, Gibney shades Armstrong’s actions with layers of gray.

Gibney narrates the film, admitting the glee he felt seeing Armstrong cycle up a mountaintop as he staged a comeback during the 2009 Tour de France. Nearly 40, Armstrong returned from retirement to race in an effort to silence his critics who claimed, correctly as it turns out, that he was doping. That race was the beginning of the end. It ignited new investigations that eventually led to him receiving a lifetime ban from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and being stripped of all his titles. Some say that if Armstrong had rested on his laurels instead of returning to cycling, he might not have been caught. But it’s very clear that Armstrong is not the kind of person who coasts when he can climb.

Part of what makes The Armstrong Life so interesting is its place in Gibney’s filmography. This is a man who covered the hubris of corporate professionals in Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, the downfalls of lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer in Casino Jack and Client 9, and a deviant priest in Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God. Like most of these men, Armstrong used his fame and power to enable his deception. Those who knew about his doping said nothing, through a cycling code of omerta. Those who did speak were sued, jeopardizing their careers and financial futures. One journalist Gibney interviews, David Walsh, was sued by Armstrong, preventing the release of his book in the United States. Cyclists were cast as outsiders for going public about their knowledge. Gibney views this aggressiveness as worse than the doping itself. Everyone else who shared the podium with Armstrong during those years was also implicated in doping. Armstrong was the last to fall, in part because he battled so aggressively against those who dared to challenge him. With his status as cycling’s emissary, the International Cycling Union was loath to defy a man who brought so much money into the sport. This power dynamic Armstrong consistently wielded to his advantage.

People who have followed news of Armstrong’s doping scandal will enjoy seeing the story expertly encapsulated within Gibney’s narrative. That being said, Gibney offers very little new information to the Armstrong tale. Those wanting an exhaustive account may be better served by reading one of the many books written on the subject. The rest of us who don’t have the time to read a half-dozen accounts about Armstrong can hear all the experts here, in one place. What Gibney offers is uniquely cinematic: an emotional connection to a beguiling man, who gives you reason both to respect and revile him.


Film Review: The Armstrong Lie

Compelling portrait of an athlete undone by his own ambition.

Nov 7, 2013

-By Sarah Sluis


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1389018-Armstrong_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

What if the same trait that makes a man a success leads to his downfall? Lance Armstrong did not want to win. He wanted to dominate. The Armstrong Lie documents a man so driven to succeed that he doped and lied about it for years. Armstrong won the Tour de France seven times, beat cancer, and became a hero in a sport that needed a public face. He also hired one of the best doctors in the performance-enhancing business and sued anyone who dared to brand him as a doper. When everyone else got caught, he didn’t, because he was a cancer survivor, a champion and a celebrity. He was untouchable.

Director Alex Gibney composes his documentary using before-and-after interviews with Armstrong. He starts in 2008 when Armstrong looks the camera in the eye and tells everyone no, he has never doped. Then Gibney picks back up with Armstrong in 2013, shortly after he confessed to Oprah Winfrey on national television. Moving back and forth in time and drawing from interviews and archival footage, Gibney shades Armstrong’s actions with layers of gray.

Gibney narrates the film, admitting the glee he felt seeing Armstrong cycle up a mountaintop as he staged a comeback during the 2009 Tour de France. Nearly 40, Armstrong returned from retirement to race in an effort to silence his critics who claimed, correctly as it turns out, that he was doping. That race was the beginning of the end. It ignited new investigations that eventually led to him receiving a lifetime ban from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and being stripped of all his titles. Some say that if Armstrong had rested on his laurels instead of returning to cycling, he might not have been caught. But it’s very clear that Armstrong is not the kind of person who coasts when he can climb.

Part of what makes The Armstrong Life so interesting is its place in Gibney’s filmography. This is a man who covered the hubris of corporate professionals in Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, the downfalls of lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer in Casino Jack and Client 9, and a deviant priest in Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God. Like most of these men, Armstrong used his fame and power to enable his deception. Those who knew about his doping said nothing, through a cycling code of omerta. Those who did speak were sued, jeopardizing their careers and financial futures. One journalist Gibney interviews, David Walsh, was sued by Armstrong, preventing the release of his book in the United States. Cyclists were cast as outsiders for going public about their knowledge. Gibney views this aggressiveness as worse than the doping itself. Everyone else who shared the podium with Armstrong during those years was also implicated in doping. Armstrong was the last to fall, in part because he battled so aggressively against those who dared to challenge him. With his status as cycling’s emissary, the International Cycling Union was loath to defy a man who brought so much money into the sport. This power dynamic Armstrong consistently wielded to his advantage.

People who have followed news of Armstrong’s doping scandal will enjoy seeing the story expertly encapsulated within Gibney’s narrative. That being said, Gibney offers very little new information to the Armstrong tale. Those wanting an exhaustive account may be better served by reading one of the many books written on the subject. The rest of us who don’t have the time to read a half-dozen accounts about Armstrong can hear all the experts here, in one place. What Gibney offers is uniquely cinematic: an emotional connection to a beguiling man, who gives you reason both to respect and revile him.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

Two Days One Night
Film Review: Two Days, One Night

Uncharacteristically, this new movie from Belgian filmmakers Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne moves rather slowly, and mostly consists of the hero having similar conversations with a number of her colleagues, yet a good cast and the Dardennes’ understated portrait of working-class life compensates for these shortcomings. More »

PK
Film Review: PK

An alien trying to return home tangles with religious authorities in a low-key Bollywood message drama. More »

A Small Section
Film Review: A Small Section of the World

Worthy but uninvolving documentary about the coffee-producing women of Costa Rica. More »

Sagrada
Film Review: Sagrada: The Mystery of Creation

The fabulous 130-year work-in-progress that is Barcelona's Sagrada Familia cathedral, as well as its crazy-brilliant originator, Antonio Gaudi, is the focus of this vividly informative documentary. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

Selma review
Film Review: Selma

An impassioned lead performance and timely parallels to contemporary social issues enliven and elevate this otherwise somewhat routine biopic. More »

Into the Woods
Film Review: Into the Woods

Over-scaled, too dark and only intermittently charming Sondheim musical adaptation does a disservice to a great cast and is often so noisy you can't even appreciate the music. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here