-By Eric Monder
For movie details, please click here.
How many warts-and-all portraits of creative “geniuses” have
already been made (in which, of course, the genius excuses the
warts and the all)? How many more must we endure?
Deconstructing
Dad—The Music, Machines and Mystery of Raymond Scott isn’t any
better or worse than the others, just more of the same. If Scott
was as great as all that, the film fails in trying to make its
case.
Who was Raymond Scott (actually born Harry Warnow in 1908)? Never
mind all the biographical details presented throughout
Deconstructing Dad by director-writer-cinematographer-editor
Stan Warnow, Scott’s worshipful son. You’ve seen and heard these
particulars all before. Just fill in the blanks about the guy who
pulled himself up by his bootstraps, focused on his art at the
expense of his personal life, alienated some people, including
family members, but created so many memorable and lasting works, it
didn’t really matter then and certainly doesn’t matter now.
Talking heads abound, so many testimonials, mostly from people
you’ve never heard of—e.g., Jeff Winner, Gert-Jan Blom, Irwin
Chusid, Herb Deutsch; just trust Warnow that these are experts in
the field. But Warnow scores a coup now and then with such
recognizable ‘big names” as the fabulously mainstream John (
Star
Wars) Williams and the reputedly offbeat Mark Mothersbaugh
(never mind the fact the once-hip Devo leader has been making movie
soundtrack rock schlock for years—
Rugrats I and II,
anyone?). Not one of these talkative heads says anything negative
about Raymond Scott—he was the first this, he was the best
that—despite the fact that absolutely nothing you hear musically
sounds “ahead of his time.”
In fact, Scott’s big-band work, animation orchestrations (Bugs
Bunny for Warner Bros.), compositions for TV (“Lucky Strikes”
commercials) and Broadway (
Lute Song with Mary Martin) sound
very much
of their time. To wit, Scott’s invention of a
pre-synthesizer machine is praised to the skies but actually
postdates (by many years) the similar-sounding and more interesting
Theremin (oh, yes, by the way, the documentary about Theremin, the
inventor, predates this film). To be sure, there are legitimate
plusses: Scott insisted on having a racially integrated band when
he worked at Warner Bros., yet one must wonder what he was thinking
when composing the music for “War Dance for Wooden Indians” (1941),
an animated film produced around the same time, not to mention some
racially charged Warner cartoons.
The only really “edgy” stuff comes from family members who admit
that Scott was a distant husband and father. But by tiptoeing
around his most transgressive act—philandering with a 12-year-old
band-singer protégé—even these observations get tiresome after a
while. (Imagine what Nick Broomfield would have done with
that story.) Thanks to the occasionally cranky personal
bits, one cannot call
Deconstructing Dad hagiographic—but
where is the deconstruction? We’re still waiting, Daddy-O.
Film Review: Deconstructing Dad - The Music, Machines and Mystery of Raymond Scott
Yet another documentary about a supposedly unheralded show-business maverick just barely holds viewer interest.
July 12, 2012
-By Eric Monder
For movie details, please click here.
How many warts-and-all portraits of creative “geniuses” have already been made (in which, of course, the genius excuses the warts and the all)? How many more must we endure?
Deconstructing Dad—The Music, Machines and Mystery of Raymond Scott isn’t any better or worse than the others, just more of the same. If Scott was as great as all that, the film fails in trying to make its case.
Who was Raymond Scott (actually born Harry Warnow in 1908)? Never mind all the biographical details presented throughout
Deconstructing Dad by director-writer-cinematographer-editor Stan Warnow, Scott’s worshipful son. You’ve seen and heard these particulars all before. Just fill in the blanks about the guy who pulled himself up by his bootstraps, focused on his art at the expense of his personal life, alienated some people, including family members, but created so many memorable and lasting works, it didn’t really matter then and certainly doesn’t matter now.
Talking heads abound, so many testimonials, mostly from people you’ve never heard of—e.g., Jeff Winner, Gert-Jan Blom, Irwin Chusid, Herb Deutsch; just trust Warnow that these are experts in the field. But Warnow scores a coup now and then with such recognizable ‘big names” as the fabulously mainstream John (
Star Wars) Williams and the reputedly offbeat Mark Mothersbaugh (never mind the fact the once-hip Devo leader has been making movie soundtrack rock schlock for years—
Rugrats I and II, anyone?). Not one of these talkative heads says anything negative about Raymond Scott—he was the first this, he was the best that—despite the fact that absolutely nothing you hear musically sounds “ahead of his time.”
In fact, Scott’s big-band work, animation orchestrations (Bugs Bunny for Warner Bros.), compositions for TV (“Lucky Strikes” commercials) and Broadway (
Lute Song with Mary Martin) sound very much
of their time. To wit, Scott’s invention of a pre-synthesizer machine is praised to the skies but actually postdates (by many years) the similar-sounding and more interesting Theremin (oh, yes, by the way, the documentary about Theremin, the inventor, predates this film). To be sure, there are legitimate plusses: Scott insisted on having a racially integrated band when he worked at Warner Bros., yet one must wonder what he was thinking when composing the music for “War Dance for Wooden Indians” (1941), an animated film produced around the same time, not to mention some racially charged Warner cartoons.
The only really “edgy” stuff comes from family members who admit that Scott was a distant husband and father. But by tiptoeing around his most transgressive act—philandering with a 12-year-old band-singer protégé—even these observations get tiresome after a while. (Imagine what Nick Broomfield would have done with
that story.) Thanks to the occasionally cranky personal bits, one cannot call
Deconstructing Dad hagiographic—but where is the deconstruction? We’re still waiting, Daddy-O.