Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: 56 UP

A dozen participants talk about their lives in the latest installment in Michael Apted's series of documentaries.

Jan 3, 2013

-By Daniel Eagan


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1369778-56_Up_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

The latest in a groundbreaking series of documentaries that have followed a group of British children since 1964, 56 UP checks in with participants of the earlier films at they approach their 60s. More reflective than previous entries, 56 UP is also a richer, fuller, more emotional experience. It's hard not to think of your own mortality as you see these lives changing before you.

Made for Granada TV, Seven UP (directed by Paul Almond) was an attempt to show how the British class system affected children's opportunities. Michael Apted, a researcher on the original film, followed up with the participants in seven-year intervals, through adolescence and into adulthood. Now most of the children have families of their own; some are grandparents.

In the earliest films, Apted interviewed the children primarily in school settings. Today, these scenes make such an impression because of the children's innocence and their apprehensions about the future. The scope of later films expanded as the participants found careers and moved to new locations.

In 56 UP, Apted devotes around ten minutes to each individual. He has warm relationships with some, and prods them gently with off-camera questions. By now he has built up a wealth of material, seven films' worth, and can draw from footage that stretches over several decades. He mixes scenes from the time the subjects were teenagers to retirees, and can overlay comments from adults while we watch them as much younger individuals.

The results are mostly encouraging, even if they confirm suspicions that wealth makes life easier. For the most part, the children have become well-adjusted, relatively successful adults. Some are facing the deaths of loved ones, yet have largely escaped personal tragedies.
What's striking is how many of the children express displeasure with the series. Some complain that the films present their lives inaccurately. John, a successful barrister, dropped out of the series because he felt that viewers saw him as too upper-class. (He has returned in part to promote his charity work in Bulgaria.)

Shocked at the level of "malice and ill-will" directed at him, Peter, a former teacher, also left the series for several years. He's back now to help promote his band, The Good Intentions.
Apted profiles Neil, one of the most troubled subjects, early in 56 UP. In previous entries Neil was either homeless or destitute. Now he has become a lay minister and moderately successful politician. His journey through life most likely was helped by Apted's periodic intrusions into his privacy.

The participants in 56 UP are introspective but still guarded, spending most of their time discussing milestones rather than addressing actual issues. John and Andrew, a solicitor, raise concerns about the environment, and everyone talks about the economy. But the consistently good behavior on display can get a little tiresome.

Apted saves the last slot for Tony, a jockey-turned-taxi driver and perhaps the star of the series. Tony is one of the few who can argue with the director, and in their exchanges some of the issues mentioned in the first film emerge again, notably race and poverty. Tony's evolution from Seven UP to 56 UP is perhaps the most surprising of all the subjects, and will leave viewers eager for the next entry.


Film Review: 56 UP

A dozen participants talk about their lives in the latest installment in Michael Apted's series of documentaries.

Jan 3, 2013

-By Daniel Eagan


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1369778-56_Up_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

The latest in a groundbreaking series of documentaries that have followed a group of British children since 1964, 56 UP checks in with participants of the earlier films at they approach their 60s. More reflective than previous entries, 56 UP is also a richer, fuller, more emotional experience. It's hard not to think of your own mortality as you see these lives changing before you.

Made for Granada TV, Seven UP (directed by Paul Almond) was an attempt to show how the British class system affected children's opportunities. Michael Apted, a researcher on the original film, followed up with the participants in seven-year intervals, through adolescence and into adulthood. Now most of the children have families of their own; some are grandparents.

In the earliest films, Apted interviewed the children primarily in school settings. Today, these scenes make such an impression because of the children's innocence and their apprehensions about the future. The scope of later films expanded as the participants found careers and moved to new locations.

In 56 UP, Apted devotes around ten minutes to each individual. He has warm relationships with some, and prods them gently with off-camera questions. By now he has built up a wealth of material, seven films' worth, and can draw from footage that stretches over several decades. He mixes scenes from the time the subjects were teenagers to retirees, and can overlay comments from adults while we watch them as much younger individuals.

The results are mostly encouraging, even if they confirm suspicions that wealth makes life easier. For the most part, the children have become well-adjusted, relatively successful adults. Some are facing the deaths of loved ones, yet have largely escaped personal tragedies.
What's striking is how many of the children express displeasure with the series. Some complain that the films present their lives inaccurately. John, a successful barrister, dropped out of the series because he felt that viewers saw him as too upper-class. (He has returned in part to promote his charity work in Bulgaria.)

Shocked at the level of "malice and ill-will" directed at him, Peter, a former teacher, also left the series for several years. He's back now to help promote his band, The Good Intentions.
Apted profiles Neil, one of the most troubled subjects, early in 56 UP. In previous entries Neil was either homeless or destitute. Now he has become a lay minister and moderately successful politician. His journey through life most likely was helped by Apted's periodic intrusions into his privacy.

The participants in 56 UP are introspective but still guarded, spending most of their time discussing milestones rather than addressing actual issues. John and Andrew, a solicitor, raise concerns about the environment, and everyone talks about the economy. But the consistently good behavior on display can get a little tiresome.

Apted saves the last slot for Tony, a jockey-turned-taxi driver and perhaps the star of the series. Tony is one of the few who can argue with the director, and in their exchanges some of the issues mentioned in the first film emerge again, notably race and poverty. Tony's evolution from Seven UP to 56 UP is perhaps the most surprising of all the subjects, and will leave viewers eager for the next entry.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

The Congress
Film Review: The Congress

Part live-action, part cornea-searing animation, this cinematic overload is ambitious but ultimately fatigues as it plays with the intriguing notion of a fading Hollywood star selling rights so her cyberspace avatar can rise to superstardom and stay forever young in virtual reality. Flashy animation and cynical stabs at celebrity culture and movie-studio finagling keep things lively for a while. More »

The Last of Robin Hood
Film Review: The Last of Robin Hood

Serviceable vehicle for a salacious story. More »

Last Weekend
Film Review: Last Weekend

A sort of modern Chekhovian study of family tensions over a country weekend, this indie drama is very pretty to look at and at times disarming, but needed more punch. More »

The Notebook
Film Review: The Notebook

An aloof adaptation of Agota Kristof's best-seller that's technically impressive but precludes audience identification. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

Sin City: A Dame to Kill For
Film Review: Sin City: A Dame to Kill For

Neither significantly better nor worse than its predecessor, the belated Sin City sequel is more of a repeat, rather than a continuation, of the original. More »

If I Stay
Film Review: If I Stay

Delivers as promised. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here