Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: You Don't Like the Truth: 4 Days Inside Guantanamo

Audiences will not “like the truth” that this newly declassified footage of a Guantanamo detainee reveals, although the title actually refers to the interrogators of 15-year-old Omar Khadr who deny the obvious truth of their prisoner’s predicament.

Sept 27, 2011

-By Maria Garcia


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1278648-Guantanamo_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

You Don’t Like the Truth is about Omar Khadr, a 15-year-old boy captured in Afghanistan in 2002, who has been at Guantanamo for nine years. The film’s footage, culled from cameras mounted in the rooms at the prison where Khadr was interrogated by Canadian and U.S. authorities, constitutes the most disturbing images of any documentary released this year. Recently declassified by the Canadian government, the seven hours of footage, edited by filmmakers Luc Côté and Patricio Henriquez, contain no physical violence. Nevertheless, the psychological barrage endured by Omar, who would have been, under ordinary circumstances, deemed a child soldier and come under the protection of the U.N., is agonizing to watch. The poor resolution, and the bars that appear across Omar’s face, obscuring his eyes, do not shield the audience from his loneliness or from the dehumanizing effect of the interrogation.

Omar’s father, allied with Al Qaeda and killed in 2003, left his teenage son, a Canadian citizen, in the care of friends in the summer of 2002. They were making bombs for use against American forces. Initially, the Khadr family, who have Egyptian and Afghani roots, traveled to Afghanistan so that the elder Khadr could conduct charitable work after that country’s internecine conflict. In July 2002, the U.S. military bombed the compound where Omar was staying. He was the sole survivor of the air strike. Like many Guantanamo detainees, Omar was denied access to a lawyer for two years, and it would be many more years before he was charged with a crime. In the film, the Canadian prime minister says that his government trusted their “closest ally” to deliver justice and to protect Omar, but a U.N. representative, also interviewed for the documentary, charges Canada with negligence in the case.

Unlike other children at the prison, Omar was not allowed to continue his education. He was also not given proper medical care for the serious injuries he received in the air strike. Michelle Shephard, a reporter for the Toronto Star, speculates in the documentary that Omar’s treatment was predicated on the fact that he was suspected of killing a U.S. soldier, a member of a squad sent in to capture or kill survivors of the bombing. Photographic evidence indicates it is very unlikely that the boy would have been able to accomplish such an attack. In 2009, Omar accepted a plea bargain in a military court, despite his having maintained his innocence throughout his Guantanamo detention. Many press outlets reported that the plea deal was arrived at so that the Obama administration could avoid having a child at the center of what would have been their first trial of a Guantanamo prisoner.

In the documentary, Omar’s cellmates at Bagram and Guantanamo recount the boy’s unusually cruel treatment. An interrogator from Bagram, Damien Crosetti—who was also under Carolyn Wood’s command at Abu Ghraib—admits to feeling compassion for Omar, and ultimately blames Canadian authorities for his fate. Other interviews, interspersed with the interrogation footage, are of a psychiatrist from the Canadian Center for Victims of Torture burdened with the thankless task of stating the obvious. More effective are interviews with Shephard and Omar’s Canadian and U.S. military lawyers. Divided into four segments, corresponding to the four days of Omar’s interrogation, the documentary allows the audience to measure the length of their remaining discomfort, but the filmmakers label the sections with words like “Hope” and “Blackmail,” setting up the viewer’s expectations and, obviously, minimizing the shocking effect of the footage.

While the interviews often contain troubling accounts of Omar’s incarceration, they are second-hand, and provide relief from the psychological torture recorded by the mounted cameras, projected in split-screen format. As if to underscore the banality of the particular evils unfolding before our eyes in You Don’t Like the Truth, the filmmakers include a third camera’s footage which is aimed at an air conditioner and the elided image of a CIA “observer.” The visages of all the interrogators are blotted out, even though their backs are to the camera; we see only Omar in long shot, seated on a chair and later on a couch. At first, the inclusion of the third square of the split screen seems odd, until the lead interrogator admits to being uncomfortably warm or cold, and the CIA observer is asked to turn the appliance on or off. After about 15 minutes, the irony of the lead interrogator’s sensitivity to temperature, given his utter lack of humanity, becomes almost too much to bear.

Not surprisingly, You Don’t Like the Truth does not have a U.S. distributor at this writing, but it is eligible for Oscar consideration by virtue of its theatrical release in New York City. Given the unfulfilled campaign promise of the current administration to close Guantanamo, and the upcoming presidential election, the documentary is poised to remind viewers of an issue obscured in the U.S. for the past three years by two wars, and the ongoing instability in many Arab countries which fuels renewed fears of terrorism. Watching this documentary, we are compelled to consider who we are as a people if our Constitution fails to protect those who, ostensibly, seek to destroy us. Cycling through outrage and then grief, as Omar Khadr abandons his expectations for justice, viewers of every political stripe will understand that the rule of law is the last thing we should ever abandon.


Film Review: You Don't Like the Truth: 4 Days Inside Guantanamo

Audiences will not “like the truth” that this newly declassified footage of a Guantanamo detainee reveals, although the title actually refers to the interrogators of 15-year-old Omar Khadr who deny the obvious truth of their prisoner’s predicament.

Sept 27, 2011

-By Maria Garcia


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1278648-Guantanamo_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

You Don’t Like the Truth is about Omar Khadr, a 15-year-old boy captured in Afghanistan in 2002, who has been at Guantanamo for nine years. The film’s footage, culled from cameras mounted in the rooms at the prison where Khadr was interrogated by Canadian and U.S. authorities, constitutes the most disturbing images of any documentary released this year. Recently declassified by the Canadian government, the seven hours of footage, edited by filmmakers Luc Côté and Patricio Henriquez, contain no physical violence. Nevertheless, the psychological barrage endured by Omar, who would have been, under ordinary circumstances, deemed a child soldier and come under the protection of the U.N., is agonizing to watch. The poor resolution, and the bars that appear across Omar’s face, obscuring his eyes, do not shield the audience from his loneliness or from the dehumanizing effect of the interrogation.

Omar’s father, allied with Al Qaeda and killed in 2003, left his teenage son, a Canadian citizen, in the care of friends in the summer of 2002. They were making bombs for use against American forces. Initially, the Khadr family, who have Egyptian and Afghani roots, traveled to Afghanistan so that the elder Khadr could conduct charitable work after that country’s internecine conflict. In July 2002, the U.S. military bombed the compound where Omar was staying. He was the sole survivor of the air strike. Like many Guantanamo detainees, Omar was denied access to a lawyer for two years, and it would be many more years before he was charged with a crime. In the film, the Canadian prime minister says that his government trusted their “closest ally” to deliver justice and to protect Omar, but a U.N. representative, also interviewed for the documentary, charges Canada with negligence in the case.

Unlike other children at the prison, Omar was not allowed to continue his education. He was also not given proper medical care for the serious injuries he received in the air strike. Michelle Shephard, a reporter for the Toronto Star, speculates in the documentary that Omar’s treatment was predicated on the fact that he was suspected of killing a U.S. soldier, a member of a squad sent in to capture or kill survivors of the bombing. Photographic evidence indicates it is very unlikely that the boy would have been able to accomplish such an attack. In 2009, Omar accepted a plea bargain in a military court, despite his having maintained his innocence throughout his Guantanamo detention. Many press outlets reported that the plea deal was arrived at so that the Obama administration could avoid having a child at the center of what would have been their first trial of a Guantanamo prisoner.

In the documentary, Omar’s cellmates at Bagram and Guantanamo recount the boy’s unusually cruel treatment. An interrogator from Bagram, Damien Crosetti—who was also under Carolyn Wood’s command at Abu Ghraib—admits to feeling compassion for Omar, and ultimately blames Canadian authorities for his fate. Other interviews, interspersed with the interrogation footage, are of a psychiatrist from the Canadian Center for Victims of Torture burdened with the thankless task of stating the obvious. More effective are interviews with Shephard and Omar’s Canadian and U.S. military lawyers. Divided into four segments, corresponding to the four days of Omar’s interrogation, the documentary allows the audience to measure the length of their remaining discomfort, but the filmmakers label the sections with words like “Hope” and “Blackmail,” setting up the viewer’s expectations and, obviously, minimizing the shocking effect of the footage.

While the interviews often contain troubling accounts of Omar’s incarceration, they are second-hand, and provide relief from the psychological torture recorded by the mounted cameras, projected in split-screen format. As if to underscore the banality of the particular evils unfolding before our eyes in You Don’t Like the Truth, the filmmakers include a third camera’s footage which is aimed at an air conditioner and the elided image of a CIA “observer.” The visages of all the interrogators are blotted out, even though their backs are to the camera; we see only Omar in long shot, seated on a chair and later on a couch. At first, the inclusion of the third square of the split screen seems odd, until the lead interrogator admits to being uncomfortably warm or cold, and the CIA observer is asked to turn the appliance on or off. After about 15 minutes, the irony of the lead interrogator’s sensitivity to temperature, given his utter lack of humanity, becomes almost too much to bear.

Not surprisingly, You Don’t Like the Truth does not have a U.S. distributor at this writing, but it is eligible for Oscar consideration by virtue of its theatrical release in New York City. Given the unfulfilled campaign promise of the current administration to close Guantanamo, and the upcoming presidential election, the documentary is poised to remind viewers of an issue obscured in the U.S. for the past three years by two wars, and the ongoing instability in many Arab countries which fuels renewed fears of terrorism. Watching this documentary, we are compelled to consider who we are as a people if our Constitution fails to protect those who, ostensibly, seek to destroy us. Cycling through outrage and then grief, as Omar Khadr abandons his expectations for justice, viewers of every political stripe will understand that the rule of law is the last thing we should ever abandon.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

Small Time
Film Review: Small Time

You might not buy a used car from the guys in Small Time, but you will enjoy the movie about their exploits, even their exploitations (of others). More »

Fading Gigolo
Film Review: Fading Gigolo

Some top screen talent gets lost in the silliness surrounding the amorous adventures of an unlikely gigolo and his even more unlikely pimp, with writer/director/actor John Turturro the shtupper “ho” co-starring with Woody Allen as the mercenary shtup-enabler. Yarmulkes off to Turturro’s brave but deeply ill-conceived comedic foray into Brooklyn’s Satmar Hasidic community and other alien territory. More »

A Promise
Film Review: A Promise

Handsomely filmed but wan period romance. More »

Final Member
Film Review: The Final Member

Breezy documentary about the aging owner of a small Icelandic museum dedicated to penises and his quest for one last, coveted exhibit is a charmer, thanks to the warmth and sly sense of humor the protagonist brings to his unusual hobby. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

Transcendence
Film Review: Transcendence

Johnny Depp is an idealistic researcher whose consciousness is uploaded into an artificial intelligence in this slick techno-thriller with delusions of seriousness from Christopher Nolan’s cinematographer. More »

Draft Day
Film Review: Draft Day

Pro football manager faces crises on the most important day of his career in a well-tooled vehicle for Kevin Costner. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here