Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: char*ac*ter

Well-known actors talk about the nature of acting, interviewed by one of their own.

Nov 29, 2012

-By Frank Lovece


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1367848-Character_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

The three actors and four actor-directors interviewed for this talking-heads documentary each see the craft of acting as a different thing, from the woo-woo to the everyday, but they have one thing in common: their friend and interviewer, actor Dabney Coleman (Nine to Five, TV's "Boardwalk Empire" and much more). His familiarity with Peter Falk, Charles Grodin, Harry Dean Stanton, Sydney Pollack (who directed him in Tootsie) and Mark Rydell (who directed him in On Golden Pond) allows him to comfortably ask more pointed and direct questions than would, perhaps, other interviewers. And while a lot of the responses in char*ac*ter probably aren't much different from what any trained journalist would get—Falk would be spinning his stories just as charmingly, Grodin would be just as baldly blunt—you can see the subjects dropping their guard and going with it.

Why do they do what they do? For Pollack, who died in 2008, it was because "I have this one life…except when I act or direct. Then I can have a million other lives." While conceding that, "sure, there's an aspect of narcissism to it," he also notes that one can slip empathetically into the lives other people not just by acting but "by reading literature… It can happen with reading, too. You don't have to be an actor to do it."

Falk talks about falling into the character you're playing so deeply that you don't even realize that it's yourself raising your arm. In those rare moments, he marvels, "You no longer hear the line that you just said… You've become one with the character." Rydell says some people simply like to dramatize things and some people don't, and actors are interested in people's behavior. He also likes that you can "lock people" into a dark room and have a captive audience for what you have to say.

For Grodin, acting is a job, but one based on maddening subjectivity. "You gotta walk through all this rejection," he says of starting out and sticking to it. "There's so many gifted people that were in acting class with me—I never saw them get a job. Just because you’re gifted…you [still] need somebody sitting looking at you who knows what they're doing. And sometimes it's right in front of them and they don't know it." Grodin figures those talented people he knew simply "turned around and went home. They didn't know there was going to be this much rejection."

He's also down on acting teachers. "I think a lot of it is a lot of bull. I think the teachers present themselves way too importantly…as all-knowing and all-powerful." He respects one of his own teachers, the late Lee Strasberg, but overall, "I spent years carrying imaginary suitcases across a room, opening imaginary windows, and raised a question about it too, and was threatened to be thrown out quite regularly because I simply asked why are we doing this."

Still, there's an "Oh, c'mon" moment when Coleman tells Pollack that famed teacher Sanford Meisner said it takes 20 years to be an actor. Pollack remarks that it takes at least that long. And that's exactly the kind of self-dramatizing hyperbole that makes a pragmatist like Grodin roll his eyes and say of acting, "It's not that mystical."

Along with all this, we get the usual fun stories about starting out and, in the case of the surprisingly hard-on-himself Stanton, who on film is the epitome of uncaring cool, regrets over a TV detective series he says director John Carpenter offered him and which would have changed his life had he not said, "I'll think about it" and never followed up.

He may have no great need for regret—it's not evident what this ostensible Carpenter series might have been, and most TV series don't last anyway, so his life might very well not have changed. In any event, neither he nor the documentary's producers do any digging or fact-checking about this or other claims, so like any such collections of personal musings, take any anecdotes involving other people advisedly.

I'm not sure what the preciousness of the title spelling is supposed to represent, and the title itself seems misleading, since the topic is acting, not being a character actor, and Falk, at least, has been primarily a leading man. Despite that minor oddness and despite incongruous inserts of Coleman giving a tour of the famed acting school The Neighborhood Playhouse, which seems from a different documentary altogether, this is a valuable record of significant individuals articulating the workings of the creative process—and all the more so since this film, completed in 2009, represents what may be the last interviews with Pollack and with Falk, who died in 2011.


Film Review: char*ac*ter

Well-known actors talk about the nature of acting, interviewed by one of their own.

Nov 29, 2012

-By Frank Lovece


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1367848-Character_Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

The three actors and four actor-directors interviewed for this talking-heads documentary each see the craft of acting as a different thing, from the woo-woo to the everyday, but they have one thing in common: their friend and interviewer, actor Dabney Coleman (Nine to Five, TV's "Boardwalk Empire" and much more). His familiarity with Peter Falk, Charles Grodin, Harry Dean Stanton, Sydney Pollack (who directed him in Tootsie) and Mark Rydell (who directed him in On Golden Pond) allows him to comfortably ask more pointed and direct questions than would, perhaps, other interviewers. And while a lot of the responses in char*ac*ter probably aren't much different from what any trained journalist would get—Falk would be spinning his stories just as charmingly, Grodin would be just as baldly blunt—you can see the subjects dropping their guard and going with it.

Why do they do what they do? For Pollack, who died in 2008, it was because "I have this one life…except when I act or direct. Then I can have a million other lives." While conceding that, "sure, there's an aspect of narcissism to it," he also notes that one can slip empathetically into the lives other people not just by acting but "by reading literature… It can happen with reading, too. You don't have to be an actor to do it."

Falk talks about falling into the character you're playing so deeply that you don't even realize that it's yourself raising your arm. In those rare moments, he marvels, "You no longer hear the line that you just said… You've become one with the character." Rydell says some people simply like to dramatize things and some people don't, and actors are interested in people's behavior. He also likes that you can "lock people" into a dark room and have a captive audience for what you have to say.

For Grodin, acting is a job, but one based on maddening subjectivity. "You gotta walk through all this rejection," he says of starting out and sticking to it. "There's so many gifted people that were in acting class with me—I never saw them get a job. Just because you’re gifted…you [still] need somebody sitting looking at you who knows what they're doing. And sometimes it's right in front of them and they don't know it." Grodin figures those talented people he knew simply "turned around and went home. They didn't know there was going to be this much rejection."

He's also down on acting teachers. "I think a lot of it is a lot of bull. I think the teachers present themselves way too importantly…as all-knowing and all-powerful." He respects one of his own teachers, the late Lee Strasberg, but overall, "I spent years carrying imaginary suitcases across a room, opening imaginary windows, and raised a question about it too, and was threatened to be thrown out quite regularly because I simply asked why are we doing this."

Still, there's an "Oh, c'mon" moment when Coleman tells Pollack that famed teacher Sanford Meisner said it takes 20 years to be an actor. Pollack remarks that it takes at least that long. And that's exactly the kind of self-dramatizing hyperbole that makes a pragmatist like Grodin roll his eyes and say of acting, "It's not that mystical."

Along with all this, we get the usual fun stories about starting out and, in the case of the surprisingly hard-on-himself Stanton, who on film is the epitome of uncaring cool, regrets over a TV detective series he says director John Carpenter offered him and which would have changed his life had he not said, "I'll think about it" and never followed up.

He may have no great need for regret—it's not evident what this ostensible Carpenter series might have been, and most TV series don't last anyway, so his life might very well not have changed. In any event, neither he nor the documentary's producers do any digging or fact-checking about this or other claims, so like any such collections of personal musings, take any anecdotes involving other people advisedly.

I'm not sure what the preciousness of the title spelling is supposed to represent, and the title itself seems misleading, since the topic is acting, not being a character actor, and Falk, at least, has been primarily a leading man. Despite that minor oddness and despite incongruous inserts of Coleman giving a tour of the famed acting school The Neighborhood Playhouse, which seems from a different documentary altogether, this is a valuable record of significant individuals articulating the workings of the creative process—and all the more so since this film, completed in 2009, represents what may be the last interviews with Pollack and with Falk, who died in 2011.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

Film Review: Magical Universe

Your interest in and tolerance of this film will largely depend on how much you can see Barbie the Doll as Barbie the Muse. More »

Film Review: All You Need Is Love

The emptily generic title gives it away: This doc is undeniably well-intentioned but basically clueless. More »

Film Review: The  ABCs of Death 2

Twenty-six short horror films by 26 different directors equals 26 ways to be disappointed. More »

Film Review: Point and Shoot

Failing to substantially plumb the larger nonfiction questions it raises, this fascinating if flawed documentary recounts the story of an American who chose to fight in the 2011 Libyan revolution. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

John Wick
Film Review: John Wick

Retired hit man seeks revenge on Russian mob in an above-average action film. More »

Fury Review
Film Review: Fury

American tanks fight superior German forces in the closing days of World War II. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here