-By Daniel Eagan
For movie details, please click here.
An experiment in what used to be called
cinéma vérité,
Leviathan received a mixed reception while making the rounds
of last year's film festivals. An abstract portrait of modern-day
fishing, it might make sense for adventurous venues. Anywhere else,
this anti-documentary will drop like a stone.
Leviathan takes place mostly aboard a fishing vessel working
off the coast of Massachusetts. The film shows groaning nets hauled
onto decks, workers who decapitate fish or slice the "wings" off
skates, torrents of blood flushed overboard, and plenty of
machinery—chains, hoists, conveyor belts.
Co-director Lucien Castaing-Taylor (who made
Sweetgrass, a well-regarded piece about sheep and
shepherds) teaches at Harvard's Sensory Ethnography Lab, where he
is fashioning a documentary aesthetic based on open-ended,
digressive storytelling. Fellow director Véréna Paravel worked on
2011's
Foreign Parts, about junkyards and auto shops in
Willets Point, near Flushing, New York.
Leviathan was shot with expendable digital cameras that were
fixed to tops of masts, flung into the ocean, dropped into bins to
be covered with fish—with predictably haphazard results.
Castaing-Taylor and Paravel favor close-ups so extreme viewers
can't be sure what they're seeing, and perspectives that are
deliberately disorienting. Shots that are upside-down, for example,
or perpendicular to the horizon. Their cameras often end up
covering the least interesting elements of scenes, either behind or
aslant of action. The frame is completely black for long stretches.
The soundtrack is largely industrial noise, with an audio clip
lifted from what sounds like Discovery Channel's "Deadliest Catch."
Leviathan has no voiceover, no identifying captions, no
attempt to provide a context for what's unfolding on the
screen.
Fifty years ago,
vérité documentarians took a similar
approach, believing it was more objective than traditional methods.
But the better filmmakers of the time still offered strong
narrative frameworks. This film has no discernible editing scheme
other than to suggest that actions are sequential.
Occasionally an image will evoke abstract painting, or works by
experimental filmmakers like Peter Hutton and Bruce Conner. And
Castaing-Taylor and Paravel have their witty moments. They list the
moon and the ocean in the cast, as well as the fish who are
shucked, gutted, dismembered, crushed, discarded, and pecked apart
by gulls in the course of the film.
Leviathan opens with an
oceanic quote from the Book of Job, and some viewers will recognize
New Bedford, the ship's home port, from its
Moby Dick
connections.
But overall the filmmakers' "You are there" style doesn't make much
sense if viewers can't tell what's going on. When it is visible,
the work in
Leviathan is boring, repetitive, monotonous, and
not much better to watch, no matter how clearly dangerous it is.
Perhaps the filmmakers consider this the antithesis of a nature
film. It's not much of a documentary either, at least not in the
sense of offering entertaining or useful information. But
Leviathan may well be on the cutting edge of sensory
ethnography films.
Film Review: Leviathan
Experimental documentary about fishing has its defenders, but will seem tedious and incoherent to most.
March 1, 2013
-By Daniel Eagan
For movie details, please click here.
An experiment in what used to be called
cinéma vérité,
Leviathan received a mixed reception while making the rounds of last year's film festivals. An abstract portrait of modern-day fishing, it might make sense for adventurous venues. Anywhere else, this anti-documentary will drop like a stone.
Leviathan takes place mostly aboard a fishing vessel working off the coast of Massachusetts. The film shows groaning nets hauled onto decks, workers who decapitate fish or slice the "wings" off skates, torrents of blood flushed overboard, and plenty of machinery—chains, hoists, conveyor belts.
Co-director Lucien Castaing-Taylor (who made
Sweetgrass, a well-regarded piece about sheep and shepherds) teaches at Harvard's Sensory Ethnography Lab, where he is fashioning a documentary aesthetic based on open-ended, digressive storytelling. Fellow director Véréna Paravel worked on 2011's
Foreign Parts, about junkyards and auto shops in Willets Point, near Flushing, New York.
Leviathan was shot with expendable digital cameras that were fixed to tops of masts, flung into the ocean, dropped into bins to be covered with fish—with predictably haphazard results. Castaing-Taylor and Paravel favor close-ups so extreme viewers can't be sure what they're seeing, and perspectives that are deliberately disorienting. Shots that are upside-down, for example, or perpendicular to the horizon. Their cameras often end up covering the least interesting elements of scenes, either behind or aslant of action. The frame is completely black for long stretches.
The soundtrack is largely industrial noise, with an audio clip lifted from what sounds like Discovery Channel's "Deadliest Catch."
Leviathan has no voiceover, no identifying captions, no attempt to provide a context for what's unfolding on the screen.
Fifty years ago,
vérité documentarians took a similar approach, believing it was more objective than traditional methods. But the better filmmakers of the time still offered strong narrative frameworks. This film has no discernible editing scheme other than to suggest that actions are sequential.
Occasionally an image will evoke abstract painting, or works by experimental filmmakers like Peter Hutton and Bruce Conner. And Castaing-Taylor and Paravel have their witty moments. They list the moon and the ocean in the cast, as well as the fish who are shucked, gutted, dismembered, crushed, discarded, and pecked apart by gulls in the course of the film.
Leviathan opens with an oceanic quote from the Book of Job, and some viewers will recognize New Bedford, the ship's home port, from its
Moby Dick connections.
But overall the filmmakers' "You are there" style doesn't make much sense if viewers can't tell what's going on. When it is visible, the work in
Leviathan is boring, repetitive, monotonous, and not much better to watch, no matter how clearly dangerous it is. Perhaps the filmmakers consider this the antithesis of a nature film. It's not much of a documentary either, at least not in the sense of offering entertaining or useful information. But
Leviathan may well be on the cutting edge of sensory ethnography films.