Reviews - Specialty Releases


Film Review: Populaire

Like biting into a stale cupcake, Populaire is all decoration, no substance.

Sept 4, 2013

-By Sarah Sluis


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1384118-Populaire-Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

Anyone tempted by the colorful, confection-like look of the French romantic comedy Populaire should head right for the classic romantic comedy section of their favorite streaming service. Any in the lot will be twice as funny and half as appalling as Populaire. The story of an aspiring secretary who is guided to the speed-typing championships by her charming but unavailable boss is set in the 1950s, and embraces the stereotypical clichés of the era more wholeheartedly than the very films it emulates. The viewer not only has to endure the predictability of seeing a “small-town girl making it in the big city,” “the secretary falling for her boss,” or the fervent belief that “no woman can be complete without love,” they have to watch a film which applauds these stereotypes.

Other throwback adaptations have understood that depicting the values of the era doesn’t mean there should also be a wholesale endorsement of them. “Mad Men” also has typewriters going in the background, but its take could not be more different than Populaire. A more apt comparison may be to the cute Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day, which had modern appeal because it featured a ’30s-era Amy Adams hopscotching around social mores. Populaire is embarrassing—its heroine simply cannot succeed on her own, we’re told, unless she’s loved by another. The race to the finish, therefore, is less about the aspiring champion, and more about her coach running to declare his love for her. Only then can she really type fast. Are you running from the theatre yet?

Young Rose Pamphyle (Déborah François) wants to get out of her small town. She also doesn’t want to marry the most eligible bachelor in the village, a fact she emphasizes to her father with a one-line yell and pushing some jars off a table, which seems so utterly typical you wonder if the movie is a farce. During an interview to be a secretary, she gets the job by showing off her spectacular hunt-and-peck skills—and unwittingly revealing a bra strap in the commotion. Combined, it’s enough for insurance exec Louis Échard (Romain Duris) to hire her. He takes her on, not as a secretary but to prepare her for the speed-typing championships. He’s tough on her in training, but it appears she’s falling for him. If he feels the same way, he doesn’t show it. His gruffness towards his pupil may have something to do with his lingering love for his childhood neighbor (Bérénice Bejo), who is married to his friend, a former American G.I. (Shaun Benson).

Even if one weren’t bothered by this uncritical time travel to 1958, the movie itself doesn’t have much going for it. The typing competitions, admittedly hard to make cinematic, lack in thrills and suspense. Montages should be a movie’s fun, guilty pleasure. Here, the “training” one is completely boring, and the “Now you’re a star!” one is barely better. The actors here are given fairly one-dimensional characters, and they’re unable to do much more with them. In particular, the romance between Rose and her boss is hard to fathom. During a misunderstanding, she’s presented as his fiancée, and she somehow seems thrilled by the association, despite his poor behavior towards her.

Perhaps The Weinstein Company acquired Populaire in hopes of another The Artist, another France-made romance set in the past that charmed U.S. audiences. The similarities between the movies end there. Populaire attempts to ape ’50s romantic comedies, yet it misses the playfulness and subversive jabs present in the movies of the era. Disappointing in its conventionality and superficiality, this movie only makes you yearn for the period classics that Populaire can’t even approach.


Film Review: Populaire

Like biting into a stale cupcake, Populaire is all decoration, no substance.

Sept 4, 2013

-By Sarah Sluis


filmjournal/photos/stylus/1384118-Populaire-Md.jpg

For movie details, please click here.

Anyone tempted by the colorful, confection-like look of the French romantic comedy Populaire should head right for the classic romantic comedy section of their favorite streaming service. Any in the lot will be twice as funny and half as appalling as Populaire. The story of an aspiring secretary who is guided to the speed-typing championships by her charming but unavailable boss is set in the 1950s, and embraces the stereotypical clichés of the era more wholeheartedly than the very films it emulates. The viewer not only has to endure the predictability of seeing a “small-town girl making it in the big city,” “the secretary falling for her boss,” or the fervent belief that “no woman can be complete without love,” they have to watch a film which applauds these stereotypes.

Other throwback adaptations have understood that depicting the values of the era doesn’t mean there should also be a wholesale endorsement of them. “Mad Men” also has typewriters going in the background, but its take could not be more different than Populaire. A more apt comparison may be to the cute Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day, which had modern appeal because it featured a ’30s-era Amy Adams hopscotching around social mores. Populaire is embarrassing—its heroine simply cannot succeed on her own, we’re told, unless she’s loved by another. The race to the finish, therefore, is less about the aspiring champion, and more about her coach running to declare his love for her. Only then can she really type fast. Are you running from the theatre yet?

Young Rose Pamphyle (Déborah François) wants to get out of her small town. She also doesn’t want to marry the most eligible bachelor in the village, a fact she emphasizes to her father with a one-line yell and pushing some jars off a table, which seems so utterly typical you wonder if the movie is a farce. During an interview to be a secretary, she gets the job by showing off her spectacular hunt-and-peck skills—and unwittingly revealing a bra strap in the commotion. Combined, it’s enough for insurance exec Louis Échard (Romain Duris) to hire her. He takes her on, not as a secretary but to prepare her for the speed-typing championships. He’s tough on her in training, but it appears she’s falling for him. If he feels the same way, he doesn’t show it. His gruffness towards his pupil may have something to do with his lingering love for his childhood neighbor (Bérénice Bejo), who is married to his friend, a former American G.I. (Shaun Benson).

Even if one weren’t bothered by this uncritical time travel to 1958, the movie itself doesn’t have much going for it. The typing competitions, admittedly hard to make cinematic, lack in thrills and suspense. Montages should be a movie’s fun, guilty pleasure. Here, the “training” one is completely boring, and the “Now you’re a star!” one is barely better. The actors here are given fairly one-dimensional characters, and they’re unable to do much more with them. In particular, the romance between Rose and her boss is hard to fathom. During a misunderstanding, she’s presented as his fiancée, and she somehow seems thrilled by the association, despite his poor behavior towards her.

Perhaps The Weinstein Company acquired Populaire in hopes of another The Artist, another France-made romance set in the past that charmed U.S. audiences. The similarities between the movies end there. Populaire attempts to ape ’50s romantic comedies, yet it misses the playfulness and subversive jabs present in the movies of the era. Disappointing in its conventionality and superficiality, this movie only makes you yearn for the period classics that Populaire can’t even approach.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

More Specialty Releases

Calvary
Film Review: Calvary

An invidious, enervating piece of work blessedly relieved by Brendan Gleeson’s empathetic portrayal of a worldly priest confronting the sins of the world. More »

Rich Hill
Film Review: Rich Hill

This study of teens trying to make it in a very depressed and depressing heartland would have benefited from more hard info and less pictorial meandering. More »

Child of God
Film Review: Child of God

Depravity abounds in this James Franco-directed adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s novel, which despite a committed performance by Scott Haze proves a one-note endurance test. More »

Cabin Fever: Patient Zero
Film Review: Cabin Fever: Patient Zero

A return to the stripped–down ferocity of Eli Roth's no-frills 2002 shocker, Cabin Fever: Patient Zero (which the title suggests is a prequel, though it doesn't really feel like one) lacks originality but delivers the body-horror goods far better than genre minimalist Ti West's Cabin Fever 2: Spring Break (2009), a broadly campy spin on ’70s high-school horror clichés. More »

ADVERTISEMENT



REVIEWS

Get On Up
Film Review: Get On Up

Chadwick Boseman is sensational in this multi-faceted portrait of troubled, pioneering soul-music giant James Brown. More »

Guardians of the Galaxy review
Film Review: Guardians of the Galaxy

With Marvel’s backing, cult filmmaker James Gunn blasts off for the stars and takes audiences along for a wild, funny ride. More »

Player for the Film Journal International website.


ADVERTISEMENT



INDUSTRY GUIDES

» Blue Sheets
FJI's guide to upcoming movie releases, including films in production and development. Check back weekly for the latest additions.

» Distribution Guide
» Equipment Guide
» Exhibition Guide

ORDER A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

Film Journal International

Subscribe to the monthly print edition of Film Journal International and get the full visual impact of this valuable resource for the cinema business.

» Click Here

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Learn how to promote your company at the Film Expo Group events: ShowEast, CineEurope, and CineAsia.

» Click Here